18th Eurasian Economic Summit
Sagacious Men Session: Road to
Peace: where does humanity go?
Speech of
Prof. Dr. Emil Constantinescu
President of
Romania 1996-200
Cultural Diplomacy, a chance
for peace in the globalized world
On Thursday,
the 14th of June 1325, the second day of Rajab 725 after
Hejjira, the 21-year-old Abu Addullah Muhammad Ibn Battuta had left
Tangier. Thirty years later, after traveling through the Middle East
and Central Asia over more than 75,000 miles, he returned to Fez,
Morocco and wrote a book: “The Famous Travels of Ibn Battuta”. His
stories reveal us the important role played by merchants traveling
the land and seas in a time when travel, trade, education and faith
coexisted in a space of dialogue and converging civilisations. My
attention was captured a long ago by his Memoirs are a significant
historical source for the early Renaissance history of my country,
Romania, where the Silk Road linking Spain and China crossed the
Amber Road descending from Scandinavia to Greece.
The cultural
heritage has always been a difficult and extremely sensitive topic
for all those interested in preserving history and making the most
of it. The main issue here is the most subjective essence of the
heritage idea. Given the circumstances, the only way to actually
solve dissensions of this kind is dialogue, a dialogue structured
according to various aspects of reality: scientific, sociologic,
cultural, artistic, and, last but not least, religious.
When looking
at the current development of the relationship between the great
monotheistic religions, it is very hard to think about the balance
we were talking about just seeing the conflicts, the mutual
intolerance or the lack of any desire for dialogue. Yet, we must not
forget that all these are nothing but the effects of a
half-understood history, a history out of which sides have chosen to
retain only the dark side. Given this situation, we are bound to ask
ourselves a very simple yet pertinent question: do we really know
our own values and norms? Or is it that everything reduces to a
shallow understanding of things, the more convenient, and the more
dangerous. Above all, culture means a dialogue everyone has
something to learn from.
In fact, the
common denominator is the human being in all its aspects, and from
this perspective Muslim, Christian or Jew can work together to
understand the greatest mysteries of this world: MAN.
We live in an
open world, in a world of communication and continuous interaction,
in a world whose continuous evolution can not be withhold. In such a
world, closed societies have no chance. At the same time,
globalization cannot be linked only to trade, to be analogized – due
to the free market dynamics – with some assets, with the most
competitive products. Beyond all these things, globalization means
acknowledgement of certain values, certain symbolical goods, it
means knowledge and - why not? - closeness and understanding.
Diversity in
ways of living and regimes is a sign of human freedom, not a sign of
error. And so, having different alternatives of achieving
prosperity, then the choice should not be necessarily a tragic one.
The
accelerating transformations in the contemporary world are
imperatively asking for our engagement in a process of re-thinking
the global society, the human relationships, and most of all the
politics and the political action significance. Politics area can
not be considered as a separate place, isolated from the day to day
reality, somewhere on the edge of morality, governed by esoteric
rules, understood only by initiated people, a space monopolized by
closed circles, not accessible to the majority, separate or even
opposite to it. The politics of the day cannot afford to limit
itself to just manage the relationship between friends and enemies;
on the contrary, it must be seen as the best way of coexistence, as
a collection of practices meant not to divide, but join together all
the society major parts around a common project.
Cultural
diplomacy is becoming more and more a tool to promote liberal
democratic values and a democracy of participation.
Cultural
diplomacy should not be taken as a panacea. It only shows that we
have more values and principles that can unite us than the ones
able to divide us. It can help us build a climate that gives us hope
that trust, in a globalized world, could be rebuilt not only between
states but also between governments, politicians and citizens.
A
„great humanity
conversation” must now be
encouraged as for larger and larger groups of regular people would
develop a freer flux of ideas and knowledge worldwide.
Not
understanding „the other’s” motivation had led, during history, to
many wrong decisions of foreign policy that triggered conflicts or
wars. The common values policy as a dialogue basis can bring about
the stability within the globalized 21st century world.
International politics, as well as classic
diplomacy, was
built on
power and
force relations and
will continue
to be
so a long time from now on.
The concept of "soft
power" is far
from being
functional. Cultural diplomacy is still as
its dawns. I want
to be well understood.
I do not plead
for replacing classic
diplomacy with the cultural one. It
would mean for me to encourage a dangerous utopia.
But I stand up
for associating them.
From my experience gained
as a
scientist, as
a man of culture
and as
a statesman, I can say
that cultural
diplomacy is
in the same
report with classic diplomacy as there are
the non-Euclidean geometry with
the Euclidean geometry, the
relativistic physics with the
Newtonian physics,
the law of included
middle with the law of excluded middle of
the Aristotelian logic, the
modernism and the
post-modernism with the classicism and
neoclassicism in
literature, music and
art. All these are
illustrations of the
order-disorder ratio, and
modern approaches
trying to
manage uncertainty
as classical ones underlie
certainty.
I believe that
we can hope for more. For the moment, both the big powers and the
international organizations UN, UNESCO or the civil society try to
create a political culture of security through negotiation and
cooperation. In order to promote peace and understanding throughout
the world we are looking for the lowest common denominator on which
everybody can agree. My opinion is that we should plan for more. If
we want to make a real peace and understanding between people, we
must focus to identify not the lowest common denominator, but
we should relate ourselves to the highest common
denominator.
Twenty years
ago, people in Eastern Europe were ready to fight and to die for
freedom and democracy. In a new millennium, let us rediscover
faith. Not in order to use it, like it happened during the long
history of humanity, against each other, but to understand our
reason on earth. Peace is the name of God; either we are Christians,
Muslims, Jewish, or believers of Asian religions. Only man’s
arrogance made him forget the message of God, no matter how we call
his name in our language or faith.
Perhaps after
the “human face communism” project has failed once and for all, it
is the right time for the new democracies to create a “human face
capitalism” project. Thus, the new twenty first century revolutions
will be not only for liberty, but also for human dignity.